Loading...
Help
Login
Busy
Search
Consolidated CDA (Sequoia) - Templates
 
Template locked

OK Not OK
Templates (External repositories)

Warning Ok
Warning
Filter
Policy Activity
Issues (2)
Change Request Status = Closed (ccda-issue-18): Erratum-277 HL7FinanciallyResponsiblePartyType value set associated with the wrong code system (CONF:16096)
TypeChange RequestStatusChange Request Status = Closed PriorityNormal
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-09-13 03:26:00: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Assignment2017-08-28 22:49:31: Assigned To dr Kai U. Heitmann by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Feedback needed 2017-08-28 22:49:20: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Reviewed in 8/28 TCON. We have more questions about how CONF numbers work between spec coming out of Trifolia and spec as implemented in Art Decor. See CONF: 8962 and CONF:16096.

ALSO, this is another issue See CONF: 8961 We are comparing the conformance statement in the IG (R1.1) to what the see as two conformance statements in Art Decor (both labeled CONF:8961. The PRF seems like it should be "required" not "optional". What do you think?
Assignment2017-08-23 19:45:37: Assigned To Didi Davis by Lisa Nelson
Description
Missing CONF:16096

CONF:8962 does not match CONF:8962 in the HL7 CDA R1.1 IG 2012-12-21 errata release.

CONF:8961 is duplicated. That is not correct.
Tracking / Status = Feedback needed 2017-08-23 19:45:15: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Could not determine how to change the value set for the codes system associated with the coded concept "GUAR" in the AssignedEntity/code.

Also concerned that the CONF: id does not match.  We should be seeing CONF:16096, but I am not seeing this conformance statement.  
Tracking / Status = In Progress 2017-08-23 19:26:55: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-08-23 19:26:26: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Finding:

-The HL7FinanciallyResponsiblePartyType value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.10416 incorrectly associates the RoleCode with code system 2.16.840.1.113883.5.110.

Suggestion:

-Prior Conformance Statements

Fix table:

Financially Responsible Party Value Set (excerpt) - update RoleCode to RoleClass which corresponds with the named OID.


AND

This code SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="GUAR" Guarantor (CodeSystem: RoleCode 2.16.840.1.113883.5.111) (CONF:16096).

Conformance Statements After Update:
-This code SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="GUAR" Guarantor (CodeSystem: RoleClass 2.16.840.1.113883.5.110) (CONF:16096).

Further explanation:

-CONF:16096

Change Request Status = Closed (ccda-issue-34): Erratum 701 Update unnecessary cardinality restriction on playing entity name [CONF: 8930]
TypeChange RequestStatusChange Request Status = Closed PriorityNormal
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-09-05 22:36:19: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Assignment2017-09-01 20:47:39: Assigned To dr Kai U. Heitmann by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Feedback needed 2017-09-01 20:47:29: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
this has the same issue as Erratum 691.  See tab in spreadsheet.
Assignment2017-08-30 12:49:21: Assigned To Didi Davis by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Feedback needed 2017-08-30 12:49:13: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Need to learn how to add a conditional conformance statement.

"The playingEntity, if present, SHALL contain at least one [1..*] name.
Tracking / Status = In Progress 2017-08-30 12:45:54: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-08-30 12:45:39: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Finding:

-Update unecessary cardinality restriction on playing entity name

Suggestion:

-Conformance Constraints Prior to Change:
The playingEntity, if present, SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] name (CONF:8930).

-Conformance Constraints After Change:

The playingEntity, if present, SHALL contain at least one [1..*] name (CONF:8930).

Further explanation:

-CONF:8930

 
 
Busy
Structure Definitions (External repositories)