Loading...
Help
Login
Busy
Search
Consolidated CDA (Sequoia) - Templates
 
Template locked

OK Not OK
Templates (External repositories)

Warning Ok
Warning
Filter
Patient Referral Act
Issues (1)
Change Request Status = Closed (ccda-issue-140): Erratum-814 Update 32443 to SHOULD value set binding
TypeChange RequestStatusChange Request Status = Closed PriorityNormal
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-10-16 21:56:17: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-09-29 05:16:47: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
The conformance statement IDs in the errata documentation don't match what I am seeing in the template. Should I make the change to the existing conformance statements even though the id's don't match the requested/document change?
Assignment2017-09-28 15:59:38: Assigned To Didi Davis by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-09-28 15:59:28: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
I updated the constraint description and deleted the existing value set binding so that I could re-add the same value set with a DYNAMIC binding. But, I could not find the tool needed to re-add the vocabulary.

Value set issue.
Assignment2017-09-26 02:47:56: Assigned To Lisa Nelson by Lisa Nelson
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-09-26 02:47:55: Tracking by Lisa Nelson
Description
Finding:

-Update 32443 to SHOULD value set binding 

Suggestion:

-Prior Conformance:
v. This observation SHOULD contain zero or one [0..1] priorityCode (ValueSet: Act Priority urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.16866 DYNAMIC) (CONF:1098-32443).
-Conformance After Update: 


v. This observation SHOULD contain zero or one [0..1] priorityCode, which SHOULD be selected from ValueSet Act Priority urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.16866 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-32443).
Further explanation:

-'32443, 

 
 
Busy
Structure Definitions (External repositories)